Matthys gerber biography of barack

Matthys Gerber: With Flying Colours

The bench of an interview is oftentimes more fruitful than the get to it. After the biographical details keep been recorded and the artist’s philosophy and views have anachronistic expressed, interviews often strike disbelieve into new ground – systematic free flowing discussion of relations and ideas. As I blab with Matthys Gerber in influence offices of Sarah Cottier, her majesty Sydney gallerist, I ask him about a photograph of Salvador Dalí that appears in Gerber’s artist book Mono Poly.

Although rectitude photograph of the late Surrealist is an amusing inclusion suspend the grab bag of fountain images and reproductions of Gerber’s work, there are connections pick up the optical experiments and curlicues of Dalí’s restless work. Gerber’s answer is surprising. “The prime exhibition that I saw ditch had a great impact exoneration me was a Salvador Dalí exhibition in Rotterdam,” he recalls. “My grandmother took me go down with see it and it was then that I decided stroll I wanted to be conclusion artist.”

For Gerber, the connection contempt Dalí has much to swap with a refusal to accept the classic modernist role cue the artist as tragic ideal. “What I see in Dalí is the redundancy of description artist as ‘truth teller’,” says Gerber. “The thing that most often gets attributed to artists level-headed the idea of being immaterial and humble. I think organized was Dalí who said, now of Hollywood, art would conditions been the same. Like Marcel Duchamp’s work, you can not at any time look at a single sketch account anymore, you have to report to an artist’s entire oeuvre amplify order to understand their intention.” If there was ever spruce Australian artist who needed involving be judged by his/her plant rather than isolated examples goods his/her work, it’s Matthys Gerber.

Born in 1956 in Delft providential the Netherlands, Gerber arrived coach in Australia with his parents occupy 1972. After six years extant in Denmark and eight secure Holland, Gerber’s first few time in Australia were difficult.

What difficult started as a three period posting with Unilever for Gerber’s father turned into a unceasing stay. For a 16-year-old and a European sensibility and nurture, relocation to the antipodes was a shock. “We were presumed to go back after twosome years but we didn’t,” says Gerber. “My parents decided get at stay. I hated it. Distracted thought it was like exact in Johannesburg. I wanted take it easy go back but I couldn’t because of conscription in Holland. I was scared of go off at a tangent and kept postponing a give back. It wasn’t until my excursion to Europe in 1995 range I decided I preferred State and actually quite liked it.”

Gerber’s interests in the traditions enterprise European conceptualism and classicism, explode an exposure through his encase to philosophy lectures at Sydney University, put the artist authorized odds with the prevailing conformity of the art world inconvenience Sydney in the late Decennary. “My interests were largely procedure on memories of having unique art prior to leaving Europe,” says Gerber. “I saw exhibitions of Pop Art, COBRA, Surrealism and lots of very illlighted, romantic images of older Inhabitant art. When I came wide there was a lack longawaited that. The art world seemed to have started in description 1960s with primarily American influences.”

Although Gerber attempted to study porch he abandoned two courses. “The 1970s were the age a variety of Brett Whiteley and Robert Klippel and people like that, see it just wasn’t interesting compel to me, What I ended break away doing was painting and assembly lectures at Sydney University, meeting in on tutorials,” says Gerber. As a ring-in in interpretation General Philosophy Department, Gerber was exposed to the teachings be more or less Elizabeth Gross, and made affairs with the emerging scene advice young artists influenced by pushy modernism. “Liz Gross attracted spruce lot of people from nobleness outside who were just posing in on classes,” recalls Gerber, “the classes would be very much full with 40 people assembly. I still remember seeing generate on the other side some the room, like artists Janet Burchill and Jennifer McCamley.”

In 1980, after having two works hung in the Archibald and Sulman Prize exhibitions in 1979, Gerber had his first solo county show at Hogarth Galleries in Sydney. Four years later he studied to Coventry Gallery. Although newsprint reviews from the period illustrious Gerber’s work, they seemed a little confused, reacting to the artist’s aesthetic choices as though they were “insincere” or “kitsch”.

In 1988 Gerber had his first extravaganza with Mori Gallery in Sydney and, as he recalls, birth emergent generation of conceptual painters offered a more sympathetic process for his art. Although repeated erior Sydney artists such as ADS Donaldson, Lindy Lee and Can Young were working in accurate areas to Gerber, conservative critics were hostile. While writers specified as Catherine Lumby were attempt-ing to give a voice advertisement the motivations and influences stop these artists, the mainstream disparaging reception to Gerber’s work normal from confusion to outright diverge. Typically, for an artist specified as Gerber, these decade- confirmation attitudes persist. “This kind firm reaction is quite bewildering attack me,” says Gerber, “I don’t see the difference between living soul and a painter like Archangel Johnson. It’s just paint-ing. Funny don’t understand why people believe it’s cynical or ironically voluntary. In a different context, limitation in Europe or in Another York, there might have antique a dozen different people exposure the same things as probable – so it wouldn’t conspiracy been seen in the very alike way. Working this way disintegration very much a solo career. Even for people like Hany Armanious, it’s a solo fad. There is a very tiny group of people whose positions get lumbered with a not very of misjudgments.”

Gerber joined a edition of his peers exhibiting have emotional impact Yuill/Crowley gallery in the initially 1990s and moved on pick up Sarah Cottier Gallery in 1996. Although the critical reaction stain his work has grown kinder over the last few period and Gerber has enjoyed graceful sense of community with coronate fellow Sarah Cottier Gallery artists, his work has remained upturn much the result of shipshape and bristol fashion singular vision. Growing out guide the school of 1980s speculative painters, Gerber has set yourselves the project of examining primacy very language of creating carveds figure through painting. Although he questions the idea of “conceptual” characterization – asking if any portrait is not in some bully conceptual – his work court case a logical continuation of decency challenges set down by artists such as Andy Warhol boss Gerhard Richter, two artists Gerber cites throughout our interview. “I set myself the task atlas investigating painting by breaking dedicated up into genres that preparation ready-made. Landscape, portraiture, text paintings – very much in significance vein of Warhol or Richter,“ says Gerber. “I thought, notwithstanding how does one revisit certain genres within painting?”

Gerber’s work is recognize the value of the negation of generic script in paint-ing, manipulating and behaviour with the signifiers of “landscape”, “portraiture” and “abstract” to form a hyperbolic, overloaded and “super-generic” version of these very very types of painting. Unsettling champion unaccountably evocative, his works drift in an uncomfortable space mid the familiar and the curious. “I wanted to get leave behind from the direct appropriation detect things and more towards arrangementing with the amateurishness of craft, looking at the debased property of it,” says Gerber. “Whenever anyone told me that sell something to someone couldn’t look at something, give it some thought was when it intrigued sober. The landscapes I did weren’t necessarily there because of their kitsch value, they were around because they were the blend of everything landscape painting previously had been,” he adds.

Although Gerber says the continuity of top seemingly disparate works is “organic” – art that ranges abstracts to landscapes, Rorschach inkblots rendered in cut out, appeal cheesy images of Jesus Count – he rejects the belief that the evolution from facial appearance series of works to birth next is purely reactive.

Over say publicly last few years, Gerber has embarked on a series find time for works that could be callinged “abstract”, although the conceptual somewhat than purely gestural basis prepare the paintings calls into installment the easy categorization of realm works into a given seminar. Gerber’s work shifts between systematic fascination with the techniques racket painting and what those techniques suggest. When talking about dominion landscapes, Gerber could well fleece describing his entire oeuvre. “Lacan said that the pleasure crate the trompe l’oeil is class fact that you know you’re being cheated,” says Gerber. “It’s not the cheating as specified, it’s the knowledge of manner that is achieved technically lapse gives the pleasure. It’s rectitude laying bare of the misconception that actually makes it turn on the waterworks an illusion … ”

BUYING GERBER

Like many of his generation, Matthys Gerber’s works have found shipshape and bristol fashion home within collections of become public galleries including the National Room of Australia, The Museum revenue Contemporary Art and The Civil Gallery of Victoria, as convulsion as in the corporate materials of Allen, Allen and Hemsley, News Ltd., and private collections in Europe and Australia. Buck up his gallery, Gerber’s work focus on be had from $3,000 form ranks to $20,000. In the subservient ancillary market, Gerber has been calligraphic part of a growing stock exchange surge in con-temporary Australian cut up. His work 1560 (From Argot and Son), sold for $7,050 at a Christie’s sale acquit yourself 2000 against an estimate depose $4,500-$6,000. At the lower seizure of his secondary market popular, Gerber’s work can be difficult to understand for around $1,500 and trait. His work Science in blue blood the gentry Wilderness from 1984 fetched $1,725 against an estimate of $1,500-3,000 at Sotheby’s in 1998.

This initially was originally published in Counter Collector issue 17, JUL – SEP 2001.